Define the user decision
A page begins with one decision, such as comparing total non-USD spending cost. Keyword variants are not separate editorial purposes.
Published editorial rules
This methodology applies to the .com publication from August 4, 2026. It replaces unsourced ranking language, generic “expert review” labels, and assumptions inherited from the former site.
Source hierarchy
A marketing homepage may be useful, but it cannot override a detailed fee schedule or cardholder agreement. When two official sources conflict, we disclose the conflict and avoid presenting the disputed fact as settled.
Editorial workflow
A page begins with one decision, such as comparing total non-USD spending cost. Keyword variants are not separate editorial purposes.
We save the provider URLs that support each material claim and note the date on which they were checked.
Merchant acceptance is not onboarding availability. Points are not cash. A custody description is not a safety guarantee.
Where possible, the analysis follows funding, conversion, card spend, FX, withdrawal, paid tiers, and reward conditions.
Missing documentation, geographic ambiguity, temporary promotions, and provider-controlled conditions remain visible in the conclusion.
A page enters the sitemap only if it is distinct, current, sourced, server-rendered, self-canonical, and useful without relying on another page.
Checked: the cited source supported the claim on the displayed review date.
Time-sensitive: a promotion, reward season, waitlist, or jurisdictional rule may expire and must be rechecked immediately before use.
Unconfirmed: no sufficiently specific primary source was available. The field is not used to decide a winner.
Stale: the source check is older than the page's permitted review window. Stale commercial pages are excluded from the sitemap until reviewed.
A card is not “best” in the abstract. Any ranked result must define the user, country, spending route, comparison date, weights, and disqualifying conditions.
Rewards are discounted for paid tiers, asset risk, caps, locked balances, and conversion costs. Country acceptance is not used as proof that residents can apply.
Legacy star ratings remain outside the indexable research set while their source trail and scoring inputs are rebuilt.
A document review means we examined published provider materials. It is not a hands-on card test. A hands-on review must disclose the tester's jurisdiction, account tier, funding method, date range, and transactions attempted. CryptoCardHQ does not use “tested” as a generic synonym for “researched.”
Commercial relationships
Some links may generate compensation. A provider cannot purchase a favourable conclusion, a higher score, inclusion in the indexable set, or removal of a sourced limitation.
Where a research page contains an affiliate destination, it is labelled near the link. Primary-source citations point to the supporting provider document, not an affiliate redirect.
Email support@cryptocardhq.com with the affected URL, disputed statement, and the most specific primary source available. Material changes are reviewed against the source hierarchy and dated on the page.